Arsiv

Etiketler ‘Challenges’

TechNet WebCast: Welcome to Hosted Exchange 2003

March 5th, 2010

Interesting WebCast for those of you new to Hosted Exchange 2003 and/or those of you who have already created your own hosting solution based on Exchange 200x -

This Support WebCast discusses Windows-based Hosting, including Hosted Exchange 2003Hosted Exchange 2003 enables service providers to offer flexible and scalable rich e-mail, messaging, and collaboration services to consumers, and to both small and medium businesses. Hosted Exchange is a tested, pre-engineered solution that is based on standard Microsoft server productsThe Support WebCast also reviews the important components of the solution and addresses common challenges in the hosting world. This includes multi-tenancy (address isolation between customers), automation and provisioning (creating new customers by using automation and without the RUS), client auto-configuration for Outlook by using RPC over HTTP, active user reporting, three-year CALs versus Service Provider Licensing Agreement, multiple services per hosted organization, and user namespace per organization.

Uncategorized , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Windows 7 RC on the Lenovo S10e

February 28th, 2010

A bit off topic from our normal posts on msgoodies, but though I’d share this anyhow, as some folks might find it useful.

I’ve found the Lenovo S10e to be pretty much the perfect netbook for me when travelling. So naturally, once the Windows 7 Release Candidate became available, I went and installed that on the box.

Now, this poses a few challenges, as the only official Lenovo-supported OS for this machine is Edition. Most things work straight off the bat, but one thing was missing – hotkey support.

Now, hotkeys actually work for some functions – volume &; brightness, for example. But you do not get the ability to turn wireless and bluetooth on or off, and you don’t get any OSD indicators of the actual hotkey actions. So this is really something you want working on the machine under Windows 7 RC

Couple of things you should know about the software for the S10e. There is no standalone hotkey application – this functionality is part of the application / driver set.

Initially, I tried installing the XP drivers / application, but no joy – didn’t work. In some cases, it would work initially, but after a reboot, OSD functionality was lost.

After some digging around on the web, what I found was this: You want Lenovo’s application, version 3.1.5.2. Once you install this, hotkeys &; OSD function as intended – also after rebooting the machine. Furthermore, it is a native Vista application, so you won’t need to run it in any sort of compatibility mode.

Being a sucker for eye candy, I think the OSD display is also a lot nicer than the included XP version as well ;-)

So, where to find Lenovo 3.1.5.2?

Go here: http://consumersupport.lenovo.com/en/DriversDownloads/drivers_show_678.html

Incoming search terms for the article:

Uncategorized , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Using SAP

February 23rd, 2010

To achieve clarity and transparency, best-run businesses are using SAP solutions to help close the gap between strategy and – optimizing the performance of the business as well as the business network. SAP solutions, along with services and a wealth of extended value from the SAP customer-focused ecosystem, help customers become clear enterprises by providing insight for improved performance, efficiency for optimized operations, and flexibility to quickly adapt to changing circumstances.

With broader insight, improved efficiency, and greater flexibility, companies can become more:

-Transparent and accountable
-Lean and agile
-Customer centric and collaborative

The clarity provided by the SAP portfolio and the ecosystem can help companies preserve profitability by addressing such as cash management, mitigation, customer loyalty, streamlining of operations, sustainability, and talent management.

Uncategorized , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

How SAP helps

February 23rd, 2010

The challenges facing your business are staggering. The economy is volatile; competition is high; and your customers are demanding more for less. You need a partner who can help bring visibility across your entire organization. One who can help you optimize operations through improved decision making and effective use of resources. A partner who can help you improve operational agility, allowing you to respond quickly to changing . A partner who can help put your business on the road to becoming a clear enterprise.

See why the Best-Run Businesses run SAP.

Through the portfolio of SAP services and solutions, as well as a wealth of extended value from the SAP customer-focused ecosystem and partners, organizations of any size or industry type can get on the path to becoming a clear enterprise. From our solutions for small and midsize companies to the SAP Business Suite and the SAP BusinessObjects portfolios, we can help bridge the gap between strategy and execution, helping you optimize cash flow, uncover inefficiencies, create credible sustainability, manage risk, automate compliance processes, improve customer loyalty, and retain valuable talent. Want proof? See how SAP can work for you at sap.com

Uncategorized , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Better Business Decisions Made Faster

February 20th, 2010

Every day, your business faces a variety of challenges. Having quick access to timely and relevant answers is key to making critical decisions. But in order to find , you need a new way to explore your data.

Introducing SAP BusinessObjects Explorer. This information-discovery software lets you search vast amounts of data, in seconds. It combines an intuitive user-interface with scalability–allowing you to empower your entire organization with business intelligence software that everyone can use. Watch the demo and experience the new SAP BusinessObjects Explorer.

With SAP BusinessObjects Explorer, you can:

Explore vast amounts of data
Find relevant answers in seconds
Visualize information with intuitive charts

SAP BusinessObjects Explorer empowers everyone in your organization with fast, easy access to information. Allowing users to explore data, spark new ideas, and find , all at the speed of thought.

Uncategorized , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Random October Bits

February 17th, 2010

I think things are going to enter a quiet period here for the rest of the year and into next year. For now, here’s a random October collection of interesting comments and newsbits that clears a whole bunch of blog-this flags in my Outlook.

Re-Titled: it was amusing to me that the Wired “Rebuilding Microsoft” article got re-titled to “Ozzie to Face New Challenges at Microsoft” when it showed up in this past Wednesday’s daily news summary. Well, I’d rather have the link vs. having it denied because of the article title.

Limited: As we all try to figure out what our reviews mean and how to manage the reviews and compensation, one commenter brought up a rule in their group that anyone over 30 months at level were slapped with Limited on their review:

I’m the “limited fiasco” AC.

Apparently some groups either didn’t get the message or chose to ignore it. I have an email from HR indicating that EVERYONE with more than 30 months at level (regardless of level) MUST get a Limited eval. This is why they added “limited scenario 1″ and “limited scenario 2″.

Your group may have chosen to ignore the memo, but I know that many divisions didn’t.

And I know that many senior 64s who got 0 stock award are sitting looking at and Amazon’s help wanted ads.

Most folks didn’t experience this and slapped FUD on that. If a group did decide to do this, I suggest forwarding that HR email to LisaB and tell her this is wrong and some heads need to be knocked around for creating a passive-aggressive punishment system. If you want people gone, RIF them already. I’ve always told people that Microsoft is pretty happy with you if you reach L63. If you look at the CSPs as well, they give you an idea about what kind of promotion velocity you should be pushing for and it pretty much goes away as you hit the mid-60-levels. The bad thing about this months-at-level idea, hopefully a FUD-dy-duddy idea, is that if people realize they are going to get punished for not getting promoted they are going to do what it takes to get promoted vs. what’s the right thing to do for their business.

More Than Human: Brier Dudley has an interesting HR-infused blog post that covers both and Microsoft: Human Resources Issues at Microsoft, Google. It points to the double LisaB article in Monday’s Seattle Times by Benjamin Romano:

And while nothing but praises should be shouted out for getting rid of the performance curve and the trended review scores, we still have a dysfunctional stack-rank review system that competes employees against their peers. Small steps.

http://minimsft/: on the upcoming internal employee discussion blog: I want Microsofties to participate on it and not crosspost from the internal blog onto here. When I recognize that happening, or when people see one that got through and point it out, I just will drop the comment into the bit-bucket. On the other hand, you’re welcome to crosspost from here and onto the internal blog to continue a discussion on a topic that you know will only include internal Microsofties.

Basic content rule: what starts internal must stay internal. If you have a comment about the discussion area from a non-content point of view then yes, please, write about it.

As for concerns about an HR sponsored discussion area being completely career-safe to engage in: well, you remember that blue Corporate Confidential book, right? HR does not exist to make your life easier. And if that Orange Scarfed Dementor Brigade starts jumping on people, especially anonymous contributors, then we’ll all know it’s time to throw in the company-provided towell.

Transfers: The new internal transfer program… well, the first response to the internal transfer post was “Hey, what new internal transfer program?” given that it was given a pretty soft-announcement by showing up in Micronews. In general, commenters believe it’s a step in the right direction, but it would be much better to just interview for the position and not ever get your manager in involved. While many left stories of revenge when they did look to interview, one story of success came in:

I asked, more appropriately informed, my manager that I am planning to interview and both the times I got promotion. I am now a level above than my peers. I got promotion in two consecutive years whereas normally I would have got one in two years.

I strongly believe that’s normally the case. Because that’s the only way to keep your super-stars within the group. But minimsft is not a forum for such people. It is forum for people who felt unjustice.

(Oooch.) A deft hand at handling your career with your current boss is always a good idea. I like BizDog’s summary of the change best:

In my opinion this is goodness all around and here’s why. Obvious is the benefit to people (ICs and managers alike) who want to change roles – now they can do an informational and have a shot at actually getting to move roles in a reasonable timeframe so they can continue to advance their career while doing great things for the company. Net is lower recruiting costs and higher employee retention – these are good things. But this is also good for managers. It allows you to actually hire strategically for your team AND for people’s career advancement which let’s face it was difficult to impossible to do before. This also allows a manager to build a truly great team when combined with the new review model. But best of all – ta-dah, yes it shines a glaring spotlight on really bad managers. Why? because they can’t hide turnover any more – yep no boat anchoring people until the manager moves on so no one sees what a nightmare they were to work for. Beautiful and bravo. It ups the game on manager accountability and that is something we very much need.

I think we have the potential before us for some really great managers – and leaders – to start thriving and growing within Microsoft.

It’s the stock price, dummy: MSFTextrememakeover discusses Microsoft’s stock recovery.

Turf-06: As for local blog drama, the spirit of some of the commenters has a new twisty-mix post Company Meeting. I don’t mind someone coming along with an opposing or dissenting view. Not at all. That’s dialogue. What’s bad is that the New Dissention seems focused on boxing previous commenters into a “loser!” box vs. respecting what they’ve said. I’d like to hear what you have to say without you whipping out the straw man argument or engaging in the tyranny of the “or.”

On the change in the mix, Anon Partner adds:

You have to wonder why after 1-1.5 years of MiniMSFT, why there is public chastisizing of Mini going on (incl at the eco meeting by LisaB very dramatically).

The turning point came when people started venting/sharing their review f/b, numbers in relation to partner compensation. That hit low and I think there is a sense of embarrassment in the upper ranks about this. It highlighted the culture at MS in a way that they didn’t expect or want. This is why there is a renewed focus on flushing out the readers/posters etc.

This is communism at its worst.

I understand LisaB wants to rebuild the trust between leadership and the rank-and-file. I think an upfront discussion of the SPSA program and rank-and-file compensation, if brought up by Microsofties, should be on the top of the list. Chastise me, please, should I stumble into falsehoods. But not for shinning a light and remarking, “whoa, that stinks!

On Photosynth:

The Photosynth tech demo you saw: WAS created by a small team, TOOK less than 4 months. IS going to be shipping in less than a month. HAS something we lack in a lot of other products: COOLNESS and WE have a lot of other cool stuff brewing…

Wake up mini-blah the mini microsoft that you talk about is growing from within the company.

and YES I do work for the team that is doing Photosynth.

The Photosynth demo rocked my world. I wish you guys all the success in the world because if you rock everyone’s world you can be instrumental in showing how to get it done and shipped.

Jürgen Gallmann: this Microsoft resignation has been pretty quiet – what does it mean? Microsoft’s top German Juergen Gallmann resigns.

The Field, revisited: a comment on MCS:

Having lived in the field for 6 years (first MCS, now sales), I can say that, from my experience, the more negative comments on this thread are the more accurate.

MCS is the biggest travesty. The comment above from the person who said that “MCS is about selling software and not generating revenue” is just completely out of touch with MCS management. Eespecially the new regime. MCS has strict marching orders under the current regime to be profitable, focus on growing the business (again – UGH!), and stick to big ($500k+) deals. They’ve gone so far that <2 week deals now require high level sign-off.

I feel like there’s a whole lot more there to discuss, but I’m not sure how best to go forward.

You Are the Universe: and to close, always this gentle reminder for those of you not super happy with how Microsoft is going for you and able to consider other employers:

Leaving MS was a difficult decision and if you are risk averse, you will not leave. But if your résumé looks good and you are a solid performer, you should have no problem finding a job, so the risk is really not all that high. Of course, if you have an MS-sponsored work visa, then you don’t have much flexibility. For those that do have flexibility, give it a shot: send out your résumé. See what offers you get. Nothing interesting? Stay where you are. But at least know what you’re options are. What have you got to lose?

Indeed! At a lull in your current cycle? Freshen up that resume and shop it around. And if you don’t leave, maybe you’ll at least find yourself refreshed and recommitted to Microsoft and your career.


Incoming search terms for the article:

Uncategorized , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Dangerous Transitions + 1 Year = Shipped Already

February 16th, 2010

Another year mark: Joe Beda’s been at Google for a year. I think all former Microsofties at Google should probably celebrate their first anniversary by getting a cake with a flying chair blazoned in icing. Or perhaps a chair bouncing harmlessly off of the Google logo… hmm, there’s a Google-doodle waiting to happen…

And most importantly for anyone looking to network with former Microsofties, Mr. Beda has the following note:

Oh yeah, and my non-compete and non-solicit contracts with Microsoft have now expired. If you are looking for new feel free to send me a resume.

It is post review season and Labor Day. A double reason to contemplate more deeply if you really love what you’re doing and whether a big change would do you good. Either you’re going to work for change deep inside Microsoft (which has to be part of an outraged cacophony demanding accountability and cut-backs) or you’re just going to free yourself up and see if you can rekindle the passion elsewhere.

Updated: formatting tweaks.

Uncategorized , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

MS Poll 06 and Happy Booming Brains

February 15th, 2010

So, have you filled out your MS Poll for the year? It doesn’t take long, especially if you don’t have any extra comments to throw into the mix. I guess if you’re a Partner you get the special leadership questions. So put a reminder on your Outlook calendar to spend five to ten minutes going through the poll and let loose what what you truly feel.

And expect that I’m the only that’s going to be harassing you to do so. Strangely, in LisaB’s kick-off email about the poll to the managers, she asked for management not to harangue people into filling out the poll. Maybe pressured people are negative? Is it a stealth poll? It will be interesting to see what the participation statistics are.

The poll seemed the same-old-same-old to me. Any interesting comments you’re putting in there? I’d be exceptionally excited if VPs had their group’s MS Poll numbers made public to help other people move around. Those with high numbers should at least brag about it as a way of attracting the best and brightest looking for new (or to get out of their sinking ship).

You know, a bigger point about MS Poll is that it’s a on you and where you are in your career. Do you feel valued? Are unnecessary rules getting in your way? Are we going in the right direction as a company? Is it a great place to work? Do you have a good deal? Does your group act upon MS Poll feedback? Are you paid well?

Listen, Good Looking: if you’re saying strongly disagree to a lot of those questions, you’ve got to hit the reality check button and decide either to find new work digs in Microsoft or a new company altogether. Think about it after you submit it. You have to take advantage of the times in our economy when you’re most valued and now is one of them. Computer Software Engineer is the #1 hot job. The boom is back. Ride the wave, either at Microsoft or someplace where you are happy.

Speaking of happiness, there’s been a lot of talking about deciding to be happy:

And then it sort of bounced around the net even more.

I’m sure Gretchen and Zoe are quite happy to be doing what they are doing at JobSyntax:

Thanks for the mention, Mini! I have started a new blog with my new company. I plan to be even more direct and honest than before. :)

So Gretchen would never, ever say: if, as you ponder the poll and your happiness, you decide now’s the time to test the waters outside of Microsoft, get in contact with us over at JobSyntax to see how we can help you find your way through the talent landscape and build your confidence to find the company that best suits you.

She’s just too cool for that.

I’m not! Strike while the hiring iron is hot, baby! Fundamental truth: the best way to advance your career is to change companies. Not jobs. Companies. And, as you ponder those experiences required to advance at Microsoft in the CSP and wonder when you’ll ever be able to meet the let alone ever be given those opportunities, just realize the best way is to leave and grow, and then see how far up the ladder you can climb should you return.

I know, a slick Mephistopheles I’m not.

Other random notes…

* Mark the calendar: April 27th, 2:30 PM PST Microsoft 3rd Quarter results. Sure would be nice if that coincides with the day that anyone who wants to can buy an Xbox 360. You know, four months after the Christmas rush. Does Bryan Lee with his amazing abilities to mis-predict still work for Microsoft? Yes, of course.

* AdamBa’s latest post, A Former Microsoftie Kapenda Thomas, reminds me of that dev vs. test vs. PM post I promised. Yes, yes, y’all, it will come but I’m still getting over that whole mess of negativity I kicked off with that little “fire da bums” post. I’ve got to see how I can fold that future post into a happy, pro-active piece before getting it up. This post from Mr. Barr is at least an example of a happy ending with pro-active people.

* This past week, Slashdot discovered an essay from last year: Working at Microsoft. I’ll once again highlight my favorite snippet:

In contrast, most of the middle management should be tossed. [...] Of the six-seven managers I’ve had, I’d relish working for (or with) only two of them again. Two were so awful that if they were hired into my current organization (even on another team), I’d quit on the spot. The other two-three were “nngh” — no significant impact on my life one way or another. I’d love to think this is some kind of fluke, that I’ve just been unlucky, but many other Microsoft employees have shared similar experiences with me.

* Finally: is it Sinofsky + Ray Ozzie to save Microsoft from itself? An Ozzie focused feature appears in Fortune magazine: Microsoft’s new brain. It’s a good read and has some length to it. Near the end:

Now comes the hard slog of reinvigorating a 70,000-employee business. Many of the new services the company is coming up with cut across multiple parts of the organization and will require much closer cooperation than has been common in the past. That makes for tension.

You could really simplify the reinvigoration by having less employees. Just throwing that out there.


Uncategorized , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Beyond Redmond Product Groups

February 15th, 2010

Time for a copy-and-paste job looking at one theme of comments: work life at Microsoft beyond the Redmond Product Groups. I’m interested in learning more about parts of Microsoft that I don’t have much interaction with and what challenges exist in those parts. Maybe you are, too.

It’s no surprise to folks out there: I don’t work in the field. I was supe- er – especially excited when MSFT in the Field blog popped up because I was looking forward to learning about the trials and tribulations folks in the field have to go through, mainly because I wanted to know, as someone not in the field, what I can do to help them win. Because when they win, we win.

There’s a disconnect, at least in my world, between the groups creating the software and the folks taking on Microsoft’s competition (or working within the wonderful world of ) one-on-one. If a deal falls through, why? How does the feedback get to me? The only time I see such feedback is usually a high-exclam explaining how an entire deal is at risk unless some unimplemented feature can easily be worked around. Usually the response is, “Sorry, you’re screwed.”

Additionally, if certain shipping features are knock-outs and helping to blow away the competition, please let me know, because I might unknowingly deprecate them in the next version to do something else.

A request in a comment looking for more discussion of Microsoft beyond the Product Group:

Mini – how about spending a post or two getting feedback and exploring other problem areas of Microsoft outside of HQ?

I’m thinking specifically of MCS (Consulting Services) – over 1,200 U.S. and 2,000+ worldwide. I left the group because of extremely dysfunctional management, bullying, sleazy engagement managers, arrogant architects, brutal travel, and a law-firm mentality of billable utilization to the point of fraud.

To prevent a mass exodus former peers say there’s an unwritten policy where there’s a 3-6 month period when a consultant CAN’T leave for another internal position, effectively locking them into the MCS org.

I was lucky getting out but suffered an ass-whupping of a review. I’d never go back, and the only reason I stayed was the pride associated with working for Microsoft.

Goodness. A follow-up comment from a now Ex-Microsoftie:

I’ve been in services since my entry into MS, and I more or less agree with this comment, but not all of it. In my former org. at least, EM’s are doing basically their jobs, which is selling services. They have quotas to fulfill, and they do what they need to get this done. I must say that my former position was NOT an EM, but you can’t blame salespeople for behaving like salespeople and trying to make their numbers.

I totally agree with sleazy management. In my case, they managed to grow the org by more that 100% in three years. What’s interesting about this is that we went from being around 50 consultants (the ones that actually bill stuff) and 10 managers/pseudo sales guys/admin staff, to being around 60 consultants and a whooping 45-50 non-consulting staff and 2 additional managerial levels. Not to mention filling most of these managerial boxes mostly with cronies from outside who didn’t know their arse from a consulting engagement, not to mention real consulting work. That and turning the workplace from a great place to work and a great team where could discuss any problem openly and respectfully, into a political arena where CYA and sucking up to the higher ups and HHRR is the norm.

After all that, I still think that MS is a great company (otherwise I wouldn’t be reading this blog right?), but I have to put my family and career first. That’s why I took a job elsewhere, and you know what? It wasn’t really hard to find something I liked (MS like company without the bullsh…)

Another proclaimed ex-Microsoftie:

4 years in services, 1 year in sales, now left the company. Services went from dynamic, innovation and customer focused to bureaucratic, utilization driven and internally focused after Mike Sinneck took over and remained so after he left. Thanks Mike for creating a little mini-IBM GS and populating it with your former colleagues.

The hallmarks of my MSO experience were weak management, self promoting behaviour and back-stabbing by “peers.” It’s such a great feeling to trust someone on your team only to find they have pre-empted all of your work and already claimed credit for it…before you even finished…and management had already rewarded them for it.

I also saw a of victories claimed when nothing of value had actually been delivered, pronouncements which were picked up by the sales/marketing management and praised, on at least one occasion, as “role model behaviour.”

I’m in a smaller, more dynamic company now, making more money for far less stress.

Another broad follow-up comment from the field that is great to end with because it has some positive thumbs-up for soon-to-be-released (when?) products:

Notes from the field …

:

General feedback I’m getting on reviews is not bad to good. I’m hearing way fewer “I got screwed” than I did under the old system.

Vista RC1 looks good, but I agree with one of the previous posters that called it a misnamed beta. The Sept EDW should release this week – I don’t remember the exact numbers, but the fixed bug count is HUGE, with tons more planned for RTM. This isn’t your daddy’s RC …

More less than positive news on the Vista front – the number of machines some of our customers have that can’t run Vista is much higher than some people estimated. I’m not sure Vista is compelling enough to drive large upgrades on desktops. I can’t imagine a public company not requiring Vista + bitlocker on laptops, particularly given the inability of high-paid consultants to order coffee and not lose their laptops …

Kudos to the Office 2007 team. Not quite there yet, but Office has some killer new features. The new version of SharePoint and the addition of Excel Services and Forms Services rock the server side too! The new interface has a learning curve, but once you get used to it, it’s hard to go back. Nicely done!

Exchange 12 or MSIT’s implementation thereof has a ways to go. I’m one of the lucky ones that gets to dogfood E12 – I truly understand the meaning of dogfooding now. Just doing my part for the greater good.

Stock is moving up … babies need a college education. Steve – if you’re reading, please don’t say anything to the street. Take a page from Bill’s book and pay someone smarter than you to do it. It’s not one of your core competencies.

SQL Server rocks! Lots of wins against Orifice. 64 bit, dual-core servers with loads of memory allow SQL Server to do some *amazing* things. With AMD’s quad-core just around the corner and ram prices continuing to fall, it only gets better.

.NET 3.0 (aka WinFX, Indigo, Avalon, et al) is generating a of buzz. Windows Workflow is getting a of attention and I’ve seen some incredible WPF prototypes. Does anybody get Cardspace (or whatever we’re calling it today)? Ruby on Rails is cool and can do some things really well, but it’s not even in the same league as .NET 3.0, particularly from a versatility standpoint.

Q1 is almost over – if we meet or exceed our sales target, and Vista and Office don’t slip again, we could see $30 for Christmas … I guarantee morale will increase as the stock crosses $30.

Getting bonus and stock vesting in a two week period didn’t suck. With 4 grants maturing next year, it becomes a non-trivial event. In general, morale in the field seems up. Either that or the happy pills really do work …

Congrats to the Fun in the Sun winners. I hear Hawaii was excellent. Now get back to work and close some Q1 business!

re: some of the MCS comments. It seems that things are better in general, but there are still some practices (or subsets) that suck. MCS lost a ** of talent over the last 5 years. Some internal, but a left the company. Services is a big business – it’s real money now – amatuer hour is over. The days of being a boutique consultancy are gone. Someone needs to step up and drive the business. Sadly, we probably need to go to IBM, EDS, or one of the Big 4 to find that person (that worked so well last time … NOT).

As for the hiring binge, there aren’t many open field positions outside of services and we’re stretched really thin. Maybe we could get some of that headcount reallocated?

Mini – thanks for inspiring people to be positive. As bad as Microsoft can be at times, it sucks *WAY* less than most of the rest of the world (that’s no reason not to continue to push for improvements, just a dose of reality for the grass is greener crowd).

Just a peek. Are there serious problems out there and are they being addressed? I’d love to know more. For my day job, I’d especially like advice on figuring out how to be in the loop with the field directly and hear from them how things are going and how we could do a better job based on competitive reality vs. our current persona-puppet theater.


Uncategorized , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Achieving Senior Level 63 at Microsoft

February 15th, 2010

I want to share some of my thoughts about succeeding at Microsoft and reaching Level 63, the Senior contributor level at Microsoft. Given that quite a few Microsofties are going to find themselves locked into their current group for a while, the ability to succeed by swinging on the to a new group is going to be rare. Within the comments, I hope to elicit advice that follows up on what I start here, and maybe even contradicts it. I’m interested in hearing your stories of success, mentorship, and turning a career that was off-path back on-track. For the folks on the path to L63, I want you to first understand your boss’s opinion of you, your opinion of yourself, what it takes to succeed in your team, and then ways you can step up and be on the right path.

Let’s Hear it for the Boy! Let’s Hear it for the Girl! If you reach L63 during your time at Microsoft, especially if you started at L60 or below, you should celebrate. Here’s to you! What an achievement! You have the right stuff to succeed and Microsoft is very happy with you.

L63 is very much an important milestone, and in tough-hiring times like these the following question has never been more important: “Will <<fill in the blank>> reach Level 63 during their career?

If you’re not there yet and your boss was asked that question by your skip-level-boss, what is your boss’s answer?

Unless you know for sure that your boss’s answer is an immediate “Absolutely!” you need to hit the pause button for one -out regarding where you are, where you’re going, and what needs to change. And I’m going to tell you right now, I’m 99.9% sure what needs to change is you. Because, except on the rare occasion, Microsoft and your team isn’t going to change.

Up until L63, you can pretty continue to be promoted based on raw talent to get things done smartly and efficiently. Things get thrown your way and you knock each and everyone of the challenges out of the park. Then perhaps you’re stuck at L62. What got you here ain’t gonna get you there. What now?

Think Locally: remember three years back when we talked about the book Corporate Confidential? It’s a good time to flip back through that. One of the key lessons is to know who is the gate keeper for your career. Pop quiz: who is it? Think about it. Ready? Let’s compare answers… answer is: your boss. Your lead. The person who puts you up for promotion and has promotion conversations with your skip level. It’s a question your boss gets asked so it’s not a surprise to them. Your boss should already have about a year-long plan about who on the team is getting promoted when – it’s essential for team promotion budget planning. And when the time comes, putting you up for a promotion to L63 is the first time your boss will be challenged by your skip-level and by your Aunt and Uncles (your boss’s peers) about one of your promotions. It’s hard for L63. Harder for L64. And a knife-fight for L65 (some other day). They will have thought this out.

If you’re saying “Ah, dude, my boss is in the way of my promotion” then all I have to say is “Duuuude, your boss is the way to your promotion.” Perhaps someone can explain to me how you get successfully promoted without your boss’s support.

So honestly, what is your boss’s answer about if you’ll reach L63? If it is “Absolutely!” then the follow-up is: after what accomplishments and around when?

Your Recently Promoted L63 Peers: let’s say you have at least one peer that in the past year or so has been promoted to L63. Why? Do you know why? Specifically, what did they accomplish, and what contributions do you see them doing to justify their promotion? Write it down in a team-culture career section you keep in OneNote (start that section now if you don’t have it).

Now read over your answer. If you’re going into that comfort zone of complaining about politics and butt-kissing and favorites, do me this favor: hold your right palm up, nice and flat like you’re about to be sworn in to testify in a trial, and now extend your right arm out nice and wide, and then quickly swing your right arm around the front of you in a nice arc that ends with the flat of your right hand quickly connecting to the left side of your face for a hard, resounding slap. Repeat. Alternate to your left hand appropriately when tired. Continue to do so until you’ve slapped yourself silly to the point that you’re not complaining about how other folks must just be connected or political or adept at the finer art of buttock tongue massage. Excuses and griping and bemoaning aren’t the stuff that L63 contributors are made of. So either keep slapping yourself or choose to wake up. Until you can be honest with yourself (and it’s not fun, trust me) you will be stuck doing what you’re doing and your complaining will be the glue keeping you there.

Turn (it) Around, Bright Eyes: every now and then I get a little bit thrilled when someone joins the team straight out of school (or with a little industry experience) and after a few months it’s obvious that Microsoft is the best company for them. They just plain resonate. They are 100% star material. Will they reach L63? Absolutely. And on one total-eclipse-rare occasion, I’ve been able to be answer the follow-up question: will they reach L65 and say with confidence: Absolutely. Well, what about everyone else? Sometimes the answer is, “well, we’ll see…” and other times the answer is, “if they’d only stop doing X and start doing Y on a sustained basis, I could see it…

If you’re not an Absolutely! then do you know what more you need to do? And in your answer, there’s a kicker follow-up: not only what you need to do to justify being promoted to L63, but to succeed in comparison to your L63 + L64 peers. For some teams – especially those like Office with few departures release-to-release resulting in level compression – that’s a rough bunch.

I have seen people turn it around. If you’re off-path, you can turn it around. You first have to be truthful with what direction you’re going in and where you actually are trying to head. Get yourself a formal or informal mentor who is already doing what you want to be doing. Successful people looooove to expound upon the secret to their success. Some can even challenge you and give you the tough love and direction you need. Buy a Principal a coffee. There is no better investment at Microsoft for tuning your career. When someone gives you the hard advice to succeed, it’s quite the gift. Don’t waste it. It’s a lot better than folks being ambivalent about your success or failure, right?

Your Team: you have to be able to understand why the L63s and L64s are where they are. You might have the Microsoft Senior Career Stage Profile in front of you all marked up and broken into more sections in OneNote, but which ones matter most to your team? And to your boss. And to your skip level. If your boss is saying “Yes, ready for promo now” and your skip is saying “No, not now” well, why?

Aspects of an L63 Contributor: some random aspects that come to my mind beyond our CSPs:

  • They can own a room: they aren’t warming a seat but rather can take charge of a conversation and represent such a deep level of knowledge that they gain respect for what they say and earn a good reputation. Their focus stays on accountable results and this person can bring resolution and closure together.
  • Expert: They are sought after to be in meetings, for instance, so that good decisions can be made.
  • Results-focused: they are focused on getting great results and don’t entwine their ego to particular solutions. They don’t get defensive if their ideas are revealed to have flaws but rather delight in being able to move to a better solution.
  • Leadership: pro-active leadership that convinces team members of the future direction and even helps to implement it. This is a big difference between those who can complain about the way things should be and those you can actually bring it about.
  • Solutions, not problems: following up on the above, they aren’t complaining about problems on the team but rather implementing and driving solutions.
  • Makes other great: the team benefits and grows from the person’s contributions. Answers questions from the team, from support, from customers. Knows what the team delivers backwards and forwards. They are a good mentor.
  • Influence when they can, scare when they must: they have fundamental skills in influencing people, but if they need to flip into junk-yard dog mode, they can. They don’t give up and walk away but rather fight when they need to fight, escalating only when needed and with lots of justification.
  • Makes the boss great: if the team and your boss are succeeding because of you, of course you’ll be succeeding too.
  • Not doing it for the promotion: if you’re out for a promotion, don’t do work specifically chose to get the promotion. This is like meeting the Buddha on the road. If you come up with a pretty plan to justify your promotion, you’ve already lost it. Such plotting is obvious and actually detrimental to your career. If, however, you’ve determined what it takes to have a successful career in your group at Microsoft and have started what you need to start and stopped what you need to stop, then you’re on the right path.

When I write all of this, I think back to an older piece by Joel Spolsky talking about Rosh Gadol contributors. Be the Rosh Gadol Microsoftie.

Also, go mine some of Dr. Brechner’s Hard Code columns.

No, never: now, going back to that <<fill in the blank>> question above: if your boss is answering “No, never” then this is a red-alert moment for you. Flip on the klaxons! Why? Because when it comes time to roll people out of the team (as teams do from time to time) this “No, never” a marker that is used to help figure out who – at I and II CSP levels – is either on-track or out. If the answer for you is “No” and you don’t like that, well, what are you going to do? I suggest understanding why it is “No” first, truthfully accepting the point-of-view as pissed off as it may make you, and then having a self-directed action-plan to get on track.

Discussion: First off, I’m going to be hard-core about comments here. I want them productive and about career success at Microsoft, especially your thoughts about achieving L63. What advice do you have to pass on? What advice do you need? What worked well and what really horked things up for you? If you’re a manager, what’s your L63 promotion philosophy? I’m not looking for any off-topic comments let alone woe-be-me comments – remember that slap thing?

If you have an itching to talk about something else, please go here: But Mini, I Want To Talk About…


Incoming search terms for the article:

Uncategorized , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,